<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tim Hortons Roll Up The Rim 2006 - Statistical analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linisus.com/blog/2006/03/03/tim-hortons-2006-statistical-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linisus.com/blog/2006/03/03/tim-hortons-2006-statistical-analysis/</link>
	<description>Blog, Photos and Articles</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.linisus.com/blog/2006/03/03/tim-hortons-2006-statistical-analysis/#comment-11280</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linisus.com/blog/2006/03/03/tim-hortons-2006-statistical-analysis/#comment-11280</guid>
		<description>It is the simplest case of binomial distribution where the trials follow bernaulli trial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the simplest case of binomial distribution where the trials follow bernaulli trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.linisus.com/blog/2006/03/03/tim-hortons-2006-statistical-analysis/#comment-876</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 20:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linisus.com/blog/2006/03/03/tim-hortons-2006-statistical-analysis/#comment-876</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting!

Depends on how you're calculating the return on the TSX, of course. =) I'd take the money over my coffees any day...

In regards to your experiment... You've probably heard a study before, where a group of researchers took a few darts and threw it at a newspaper - wherever it landed was the stocks the researchers were going to buy. They then compared the ending portfolios of their random one against professionally maintained portfolios. The result was that the random one was, on average, performed better than the  professionally maintained ones!

The take-away? Invest in dart-making companies. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting!</p>
<p>Depends on how you&#8217;re calculating the return on the TSX, of course. =) I&#8217;d take the money over my coffees any day&#8230;</p>
<p>In regards to your experiment&#8230; You&#8217;ve probably heard a study before, where a group of researchers took a few darts and threw it at a newspaper - wherever it landed was the stocks the researchers were going to buy. They then compared the ending portfolios of their random one against professionally maintained portfolios. The result was that the random one was, on average, performed better than the  professionally maintained ones!</p>
<p>The take-away? Invest in dart-making companies. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.linisus.com/blog/2006/03/03/tim-hortons-2006-statistical-analysis/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 20:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linisus.com/blog/2006/03/03/tim-hortons-2006-statistical-analysis/#comment-875</guid>
		<description>Sweet! I'm doing something similar this year, but not quite so, umm... mathematical. More pragmatic. Buy coffee. Buy Super-7. Pretend to buy random stocks on the TSX. Watch which one does better....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet! I&#8217;m doing something similar this year, but not quite so, umm&#8230; mathematical. More pragmatic. Buy coffee. Buy Super-7. Pretend to buy random stocks on the TSX. Watch which one does better&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 4.051 seconds -->
